Mar 20, 2009, 06:56 PM // 18:56
|
#1
|
Academy Page
|
Change the Treasure/Wisdom HoM requirements
I understand that when the titles were character-based, it required that the character has 10,000 high-end chests opened/gold items identified, respectively. Thats because all character based titles are required to be maxed out before being able to show on HoM. Well, now it's account-based. And with the exception of the above titles, the account-based titles do not need to be maxed out for HoM displays. Personally I don't like grind and perhaps Linsey can look into it to change the title requirements to rank 3 or 4. It's just a thought. Anyone agree?
Last edited by Faction Gambler; Mar 21, 2009 at 05:52 AM // 05:52..
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 07:24 PM // 19:24
|
#2
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
|
So you want it to be lowered from 7 to either 3 or 4 for display at the HoM? Not completely sure what you're asking. I can live with that I suppose, but not sure about why it would be needed. Lucky/Unlucky are only rank 2 required for HoM display, so I can see a use for lowering the TH/Wisdom requirements for HoM.
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 08:13 PM // 20:13
|
#3
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BC Canada
Guild: Guild With No [NAM트]
|
even tho i have them both maxed anyway, i agree with OP. seeing as lucky/treasure/wisdom are all linked, and lucky can be added at a lower tier, it would make sense that treasure/wisdom should be the same.
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 08:16 PM // 20:16
|
#4
|
Atra esterní ono thelduin
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madness Incarnate
Guild: [Duo]
Profession: W/P
|
I agree since these titles are now account-wide and similar in difficulty to the lucky/unlucky and kurz/luxon titles that do not have to be maxed to be displayed. The requirement should be dropped down to rank 4 or 5 for being displayed.
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 08:59 PM // 20:59
|
#5
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kemi, Finland.
Guild: Pirates of the Searing [YoHo]
Profession: Mo/
|
I agree too. Compared to other titles, maxing those two takes a shitload of work.
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 09:08 PM // 21:08
|
#6
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Guild: X Knock Out X [KO]
Profession: Me/
|
yep, totally agreed.
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 09:08 PM // 21:08
|
#7
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Nov 2007
Guild: Sacred Forge Knights
Profession: W/P
|
I think adding them at rank 5 makes more sense. These titles are not necessarily grind tiles if you are playing the game. After rank 5 though you have to farm them.
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 09:31 PM // 21:31
|
#8
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wales
Guild: Order of the Azurelight[OA]
Profession: E/
|
signed, im still only rank 2 in treasure hunter xD
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 09:31 PM // 21:31
|
#9
|
Departed from Tyria
Join Date: May 2007
Guild: Clan Dethryche [dth]
Profession: R/
|
For consistency's sake, this could be changed. However, when you think about it, the change from making the titles character based to account based made the title easier to achieve for anyone with points in either track on more than one character, and it also made utilizing the bonus from both titles more convenient.
And now you're asking for the requirement to be even easier. Why? It seems totally unnecessary.
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 09:34 PM // 21:34
|
#10
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazil
Guild: Agents of Indecision[meh]
Profession: Me/
|
not only the time farming for the money,chest running and farming for ids takes alot of time which most people dont have the time to spend.lowering its requirement for 2,5k or at least 5k chests/golds for HoM 'd be nice.
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 10:30 PM // 22:30
|
#11
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: May 2006
Profession: R/
|
Makes sense, really.
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2009, 10:39 PM // 22:39
|
#12
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2008
Guild: Lowlandlions
Profession: N/
|
/unsigned Because its only easier now since they changed it to max it. And it helps the economy staying atleast something because people still buy goldies for 7 = 5k. And it isn't fair for the people who wanted the Stat in they HoM and maxed it. So dont say that things need to change at the HoM it is as it is and just go for something in it. It doesnt matter that something is harder then other things to get. Otherwhich they can just make every title atable at rank1 ... ^^
They can better give us those Rare minipets noone can get since they cost 16mil or more.
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 12:40 AM // 00:40
|
#13
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Europe
|
oh yeah babe sounds like a great plan...
/signed
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 12:53 AM // 00:53
|
#14
|
Academy Page
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: The Gear Trick
Profession: E/R
|
/signed
I think the current requirement is ridiculous.
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 01:41 AM // 01:41
|
#15
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2008
Profession: Mo/
|
i can prolly live with them lowering it to tier 6 which is 5k chests seeing that it takes another 5k chest to max it but any lower and i would have to disapointed as now u can open chests with any character on ur account and id golds which was a pain before i could only do it with one character.
/notsigned
btw neither of my titles are maxed currently R6 on both
Last edited by hawaiian143; Mar 21, 2009 at 03:01 AM // 03:01..
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 02:07 AM // 02:07
|
#16
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Profession: W/
|
/SIGNED 12chrs
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 02:39 AM // 02:39
|
#17
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Profession: Rt/
|
/notsigned
there is no reason to change this. The title has already been made easier to max out by making it account wide. It is not as difficult difficult to max these titles out now that it doesnt matter which of your characters you are playing on when you open chests or ID gold items. Sure it takes some time to max out, its supposed to. Titles are supposed to be something you work for in order to have bragging rights in your HoM, if we continue to lower the requirements to display more titles more easilly, they will then all be worthless. It just seems like this is a bit of a QQ thread, people dont want to max the title becuase it takes some effort, so want the display requirement lowered so they can display it without actually completing it. (and for the record, no I do not have either maxed out yet, I am R5 on both)
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 02:39 AM // 02:39
|
#18
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: W/
|
Sorta neutral on this. Not necessarily bcoz it has become relatively easier than before, but, maybe bcoz one can treat as a vanity title to put in HoM. Either way, I don't plan to max them.
/signed for those who care.
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 02:48 AM // 02:48
|
#19
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Slovenia
Guild: Scars Meadows [SMS]
Profession: Mo/
|
/notsigned
Title was already made easy enough with account-wide change. No need to make it any easier.
|
|
|
Mar 21, 2009, 03:00 AM // 03:00
|
#20
|
Nothing, tra la la?
|
/signed
So it will be similar to the others...why not.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM // 11:37.
|